PDA

View Full Version : Strategic A330 forced landing


Nigel C
28th January 2009, 03:00 PM
Looks like the recent maintenance missed something, or spilt something where they shouldn't have...

Cabin fumes force down military plane

AAP
January 28, 2009 03:23pm

A PLANE carrying Australian defence personnel and supplies to the Middle East has been forced to make an emergency landing in Darwin after smoke and fumes filled the cabin.
At least three people were taken to hospital suffering smoke inhalation soon after the plane returned to Darwin International Airport at 2.10am (CST) today.

The Airbus A330 had taken off from the same airport at 11.15pm (CST) yesterday.

Private Australian company Strategic Aviation had been hired by the Australian Defence Force to transport passengers and light cargo as part of a "regular sustainment service'' to Kuwait, a defence spokeswoman said.

She was unable to confirm media reports that there had been 80 ADF personnel aboard the flight.
Simon Moore, commercial manager of Strategic Aviation, said the plane was 40 minutes into the eight-hour flight when the crew noticed "a strong smell within the cabin''.

"The captain and crew followed normal operating procedures and returned to Darwin to investigate the issue,'' he said.

"No passengers were affected however three crew members were taken to Darwin hospital as a precautionary measure.''

But a Darwin Airport spokeswoman said those taken to Royal Darwin Hospital, and later released, were "one crew and two passengers''.

The airport spokeswoman described the incident as a "full emergency situation with smoke and fumes in cabin''.

The plane was currently parked at the airport with "all doors and hatches open,'' she said.

Mr Moore said the "irregular smell'' was believed to have come from an air-conditioning system.

It is currently being in investigated by the company, with the ADF saying it believed "a technical fault'' had forced the landing.

"The aircraft landed safely and without further incident. All company and operational procedures were followed,'' Mr Moore said.

The defence spokeswoman said no ADF personnel were injured as a result of the incident and the department would not release details about how many people were on board the flight.

"Personal details of the ADF personnel aboard the flight will not be released,'' she said.

Strategic Aviation was accused in July 2007 of caring more about profits than safety.

Former staff told the ABC that the company, which has carried thousands of Australian troops to overseas war zones, was failing to maintain a commitment to aviation safety standards.

Strategic Aviation strenuously denied the claims and said it was the victim of a commercially motivated campaign to discredit it.

Marty H
28th January 2009, 03:38 PM
I have a freind who works for Strategic Aviation and is based in DRW, will have to find out if he was on board.

Nigel C
28th January 2009, 07:20 PM
however three crew members were taken to Darwin hospital

Confusion solved!

The crew, not the pax, were taken to hospital.

Chris B.
29th January 2009, 01:46 AM
Ah yes BUT!

a Darwin Airport spokeswoman said those taken to Royal Darwin Hospital, and later released, were "one crew and two passengers''.

Daniel G
29th January 2009, 09:36 AM
Without meaning to sound too pedantic, the title was a little misleading... Not quite a forced landing!

Phillippe M
29th January 2009, 09:51 PM
Here is a media release from NT Airports about the Strategic A330 Incident and the correct/incorrect information given to the media etc....

http://www.ntairports.com.au/Portals/0/MR%20-%20Statement%20re%20A330%20Incident%20_2_.pdf

NickN
30th January 2009, 07:22 AM
Without meaning to sound too pedantic, the title was a little misleading... Not quite a forced landing!

Are you for real? Normally when a cabin is engulfed with toxic fumes you don't have any choice but to land do you? (Unless you'd prefer to suffocate). So yes it was forced to land.

Matt_L
30th January 2009, 07:27 AM
Are you for real? Normally when a cabin is engulfed with toxic fumes you don't have any choice but to land do you? (Unless you'd prefer to suffocate). So yes it was forced to land.

What Dan means is that a forced landing is often in aviation terms one which involves a plane losing its engine/engines say like a 172 and then landing in a paddock or even with an airliner where it is in immediate danger, rather then just a bad smell like in this case.

Rather this would be more like a diversion or precautionary landing. I think thats what he meant anyways?;)

Brad Myer
30th January 2009, 09:07 AM
Hmmm funny how I never saw anything on the news about this... Yet a dog chews a few wires on a QF jet and it makes headlines!

D Chan
30th January 2009, 08:52 PM
Rather this would be more like a diversion or precautionary landing. I think thats what he meant anyways?;)

smoke in cabin is pretty serious. At the minimum it is a pan, could require a mayday call as well

Marty H
30th January 2009, 11:55 PM
From what I have been told by my mate who was on this flight, there were about five hours out from DRW and the alarms kept going off in the toilets, and crew started feeling unwell from fumes and they returned to DRW, there was no smoke or flames as reported in the media.

Daniel G
30th January 2009, 11:57 PM
What Dan means is that a forced landing is often in aviation terms one which involves a plane losing its engine/engines say like a 172 and then landing in a paddock or even with an airliner where it is in immediate danger, rather then just a bad smell like in this case.

Thanks Matt. I'm not saying it wasn't serious, just not a forced landing in the true sense of the term.

Bob C
31st January 2009, 12:52 AM
Hi Marty

Where did your mate get his "five hours out from Darwin" thought ?

According to the leading post in this thread, (part quoted below), the aircraft returned to Darwin less than three hours after taking off.

".....At least three people were taken to hospital suffering smoke inhalation soon after the plane returned to Darwin International Airport at 2.10am (CST) today.

The Airbus A330 had taken off from the same airport at 11.15pm (CST) yesterday."

And Simon Moore, commercial manager of Strategic Aviation, said the plane was 40 minutes into the eight-hour flight when the crew noticed "a strong smell within the cabin''.

Marty H
31st January 2009, 07:48 AM
Hi Marty

Where did your mate get his "five hours out from Darwin" thought ?

According to the leading post in this thread, (part quoted below), the aircraft returned to Darwin less than three hours after taking off.

".....At least three people were taken to hospital suffering smoke inhalation soon after the plane returned to Darwin International Airport at 2.10am (CST) today.

The Airbus A330 had taken off from the same airport at 11.15pm (CST) yesterday."

And Simon Moore, commercial manager of Strategic Aviation, said the plane was 40 minutes into the eight-hour flight when the crew noticed "a strong smell within the cabin''.


From his own mouth its what he told me, he is now in Kuwait the aircraft left 24hrs later.

David N
31st January 2009, 07:50 AM
Without meaning to sound too pedantic, the title was a little misleading... Not quite a forced landing!

Forced Landing
An unexpected landing that a pilot of an aircraft has to make because of an emergency situation

Source: Dictionary of Aviation (Second Edition)

Bob C
31st January 2009, 10:07 AM
Thanks Marty - but what he told you and what was reported are vastly different - hence my question .

If the A330 had been more than 5 hours into the (8 hour) flight, it would have been a long way from Darwin and methinks there may have been other alternates available. And the round trip would therefore be nearly 11 hours !

So someone has their facts incorrect.

Marty H
31st January 2009, 10:44 AM
Thanks Marty - but what he told you and what was reported are vastly different - hence my question .

If the A330 had been more than 5 hours into the (8 hour) flight, it would have been a long way from Darwin and methinks there may have been other alternates available. And the round trip would therefore be nearly 11 hours !

So someone has their facts incorrect.

No worries, just going by what I was told;)

Grahame Hutchison
1st February 2009, 05:16 PM
Back operating again after the recent problems ....

CS-TMT 5K0005 01/02/2009 15:35 HiFly ADF Charter A330-321

Looks like the return to Sydney from Darwin.

ACARS mode: 2 Aircraft reg: .CS-TMT
Message label: H1 Block id: 4 Msg. no: D39A
Flight id: 5K0005
Message content:-
#DFBD764R01/A33001,1,1
.CS-TMT,09FEB01,02.29.45,YPDN,YSSY,ASY005XXXX,5000,917
002,06.0,000000,SE6N03,VN6003,LXR001,000,052,052
N08.5,35003,0.821,111,0.00,111,10,0,01,111,1.48,X
N08.5,35002,0.822,111
733363
-------------------------------------[01/02/2009 15:35]