PDA

View Full Version : AC34 SYD/YVR reporting fire onboard.


Trevor Sinclair
28th July 2011, 11:49 AM
Air Canada is reportedly dumping fuel due to the detection of a fire onboard over Sydney. Has anyone heard any more on this, I received a very brief message a few minutes ago.

Danny Rizk
28th July 2011, 11:53 AM
Just heard on the news, expected to land shortly...

patrick woodward
28th July 2011, 11:54 AM
Fuel dump complete.... Pan declared, returning to Sydney.

patrick woodward
28th July 2011, 11:58 AM
On descent now for 34L.... local services on standby.

Maikha Ly
28th July 2011, 11:58 AM
Listening now on LiveATC.net - http://www.liveatc.net/search/?icao=yssy

Craig Lindsay
28th July 2011, 11:59 AM
its over hornsby now One of the galleys is on fire which cant be contained

Tim Bowrey
28th July 2011, 11:59 AM
C-FIUA is the aircraft on decent 3,000ft.

Chris Q
28th July 2011, 12:00 PM
can see it on FR24 coming back now

hope its all good!

Mark T
28th July 2011, 12:06 PM
Hi Trevor

Just checked on Basestation and Air Canada has done a big loop and now returned to Sydney. Currently at 5000 feet.

Registration is C-FIUA

Cheers
Mark

Tim Bowrey
28th July 2011, 12:11 PM
Cleared to land 34L. I saw it from my house fly past it looked normal and the pilots didnt sounded stressed at all so sounds all good.

Ryan N
28th July 2011, 12:11 PM
watching the landing now on Sky NEws.

James G.
28th July 2011, 12:12 PM
It should have just landed on 34L.

Michael Mak
28th July 2011, 12:13 PM
Just landed and transferred to Ground 126.5

Trevor Sinclair
28th July 2011, 12:15 PM
Thanks guys. Watched on planefinder and listened on http://www.liveatc.net/search/?icao=yssy

Trevor Sinclair
28th July 2011, 12:48 PM
Air Canada now claiming was not a fire, but smoke from an oven. Not sure how that would have been deemed "uncontainable".

Maikha Ly
28th July 2011, 12:58 PM
This made it live on Ch7 news
http://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/latest/a/-/newshome/9930403/air-canada-flight-fire-sydney/2/#comments

I'll tell you what, the narrow minded comments of cyberspace (Found at the bottom) can easily infuriate!

Jacob P
28th July 2011, 01:10 PM
Another classic example of media over-reacting to a relativley minor incident. Could only imagine what it'd be like if it was a QF aircraft :rolleyes:

Nigel C
28th July 2011, 01:50 PM
its over hornsby now One of the galleys is on fire which cant be contained

I'm curious as to where you got this info from...

The pilot told the ARFF on 131.0 that any smoke dissipated once the power was disconnected from the galley oven.

Aircraft has been refuelled and expects to depart this afternoon.

Tim Bowrey
28th July 2011, 01:56 PM
Lining up On 34L now for departure.

And departed.

Chris Q
28th July 2011, 02:28 PM
Nigel - that info was on the news websites...of course!

So she has gone back to the motherland hey?

David N
28th July 2011, 02:39 PM
I went to listen to the ATC Achive but No File was Found.
Is the correct time it first made radio contact around 0730 UTC?


Thanks

Jason H
28th July 2011, 03:44 PM
It landed around 12.15 which is 0215 UTC so probably from around 0200z would work quite well.

That Ch7 breaking news clip was a waste of everyone who was watching's time in my opinion. Joke.

Justin L
28th July 2011, 03:50 PM
May I ask why you think the Channel 7 clip was a joke Jason? It's definitely newsworthy, and when they need to go live to the newsroom with breaking news and not much information, how else should they handle it?

Jacob P
28th July 2011, 04:12 PM
Hey Justin,

have to agree with you on that one. I mean look at QF32 engine explosion, initial reports were indicating that the whole aircraft exploded and then as more information came to hand, the story developed further.

Jason H
28th July 2011, 04:26 PM
I think words like "full scale emergency" when it was a PAN call is over the top. I am aware it was a breaking news story and information is unclear, but it is misleading...but I guess we know what the media is like in these situations. The article on that link also says "emergency services were not required". It seems as though the reporter just said things that she would assume was happening, rather than knowing what was happening. I'm sure they have people checking all this stuff. I think that if they didn't have the chopper there to film the landing, it would most likely have been a small mention in the bulletin.

Lee G
29th July 2011, 01:43 PM
Got to love the Daily Telegraph though ... today's edition on Page 2 ... a small picture of Ac34 inset into a larger picture of what they claimed was AC34 dumping fuel.

Look closely at the "AC34" aircraft - it actuallly an overflying SQ 777 which passed overhead 5 minutes after AC34 arrived back in Sydney.

And the mainstream press wonder why they are becoming increasingly irrelevant in today's connected world - they couldn't even get it right 12 hours after the event which is when they would have finalised the layout for the paper!