Sydney Airport Message Board

Sydney Airport Message Board (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/index.php)

- Australia and New Zealand Industry (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/forumdisplay.php?f=2)

- - Qantas Shutdown (http://www.yssyforum.net/board/showthread.php?t=7499)

I thought they didn't have enough 332s to operate SYD-BOM non-stop or the 333s didn't have the range to do it non-stop at the time?

After the cessation of 743 non-stop services, 333s were used on SYD-BOM with a stop in Darwin on the outbound sector only (where customers could leave or join the flight). Short haul cabin crew began operating this flight after a short time due to a crew change being required in Darwin and the difficulty in positioning long haul cabin crew in Darwin efficiently.

In Jan/Feb 2008, the flight became non-stop once more with the arrival of 332s. Due to the outbound sector duty time exceeding 14 hours, short haul cabin crew could no longer operate the flight and it reverted to being operated by long haul cabin crew.

Quote:

We won't hire any more airport workers: Qantas

30 May 2012 5:07pm

A senior Qantas manager has told a FWA full bench during the arbitration of its dispute with the TWU that culminated in last year's lockout and fleet grounding that the airline will not in future directly hire any more workers in its airports division.

The union's secretary, Tony Sheldon, has seized on the comment to support his claim that Qantas's long-term goal is to shift its entire direct workforce to labour hire firms, either those it owns or separate companies, and contractors.

He also said today that if the tribunal handed down a decision that allowed Qantas to pursue its outsourcing strategy, then the Federal Government needed to amend the Fair Work Act.

Qantas's executive manager of ground operations, Matthew Lee, during cross examination (see from PN5412) earlier this month, agreed that he made up his mind ahead of last year's negotiations for a new ground employees agreement that all future workers engaged in airports would be an employee of its ground-services subsidiary, Qantas Ground Services (QGS) (see Related Article).

When asked by TWU barrister Adam Hatcher SC whether it followed that, at least as far as the airports division was concerned, there would in future not be any new person employed by Qantas, he said: "Yes, that's correct."

He agreed it wasn't a negotiating item, but a decision that Qantas made before bargaining began then announced to the union in the course of their meetings.

"It was something that you decided to do as a matter of business strategy?" Hatcher asked.

"Correct," he responded.

Lee gave evidence that Qantas currently had 1662 direct employees in airports.

The parties are in the 11th day of their 14-day arbitration - before Vice President Graeme Watson, Senior Deputy President Anne Harrison and Commissioner Greg Harrison - of last year's dispute over a new deal for ramp workers, baggage handlers, cleaners and catering workers.

The key argument the TWU has put to the bench is that a workplace determination that didn't include site rates would over time cover only a "dwindling legacy workforce", and Sheldon today said the comments by Matthew Lee supported its case (see Related Article).

However, Qantas has told the full bench that it shouldn't do directly what it couldn't do indirectly, which was to spread Qantas rates to QGS, which was not part of last year's dispute and outside the jurisdiction of the workplace determination.

Harry Dixon SC, representing the airline, told FWA when the case began in March that it was a clear premise of Qantas's agreement with the TWU on QGS that the subsidiary's workers would be paid a lower hourly rate to constrain the airline from outsourcing.

Qantas established QGS - which has an enterprise agreement with the TWU - in 2009 in settlement of a dispute between the parties over outsourcing of the baggage room in Perth.

Hatcher said in his opening submission that it was set up to cover labour hire employees and provide an alternative to third party arrangements and that the airline's plan to use it to undermine direct employment breached undertakings given in writing at the time.

The Fair Work Ombudsman on Monday begun prosecuting two Qantas entities and Jetstar for allegedly paying foreign-based cabin crew working in Australian territory only half of their minimum entitlements (see Related Article).

Source: Workplace Express

Qantas profit to drop by up to 90 per cent

Quote:

QANTAS Airways expects a fall of up to 91 per cent in its full year underlying profit due to the troubled European economy and soaring fuel costs.
Qantas today said it expected its underlying profit before tax in the year to June 30 to be in the range of $50 million to $100 million.

That would be down from an underlying profit before tax of $552 million in the previous financial year.

"The forecast result reflects the recent deterioration in global aviation operating conditions driven by the European economic crisis, the group's highest ever jet fuel bill, and substantial capacity increases in the domestic market that have reduced yields," Qantas said in a statement.

YIKES!!!
Source: News.com.au

It is better than a loss... As many other airlines will post.

EK, SQ, CX, have all posted downgraded performance.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thomas Collins (Post 75016)

It is better than a loss... As many other airlines will post.

EK, SQ, CX, have all posted downgraded performance.

But -90% Thomas?

Still better than a loss, even if it was 99% down. In other words it could be worse. Do also remember that last year a good $90m was courtesy of Rolls Royce.

Mike - I am not sure what you're confused about.

It is still a profit.

There will be airlines that will post a loss.

Last time I checked - a loss is not good...