Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Spotting and Movements > Spotting and Movements
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21st November 2009, 07:08 AM
Peter Agatsiotis Peter Agatsiotis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St Clair 60km from YSSY
Posts: 1,630
Default Storms/curfew!

Just checking yesterday's movements and looks like the storms last night must have continued near the airport well into the night.

3 a/c were logged at 12:46AM thru 12:59AM:

CPA138 12:46am
QFA21 12:48am
UAE413 12:59am

they must have received curfew dispensation for them to leave that late.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21st November 2009, 12:37 PM
Phil M Phil M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Default

There were 5 that left after 12:30am this morning. They all taxied before 11pm and waited for the wind to abate... All perfectly legal
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23rd November 2009, 12:41 PM
Les Taylor Les Taylor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
Default Curfew Departures

I am a bit puzzled by the post. They departed at after 12.45 am, yet taxied before 11pm. This seems like a very long time to be waiting around for wind to abate.

I am no expert, but in conditions of unfavourable weather, how long in practice would a crew wait for weather to subside before deciding not to take off? Twenty minutes, half an hour, would these waiting times usually be considered reasonable?

On a related subject, from the perspective of persons living near the airport, even if an aircraft DID commence its taxi before 11pm, the guidelines from DOTARS provide that it would be a very rare occurrence that a dispensation would allow an aircraft to depart after midnight. Would the supervisory authorities, even if this were technically legal, still disapprove of the events described in this post?

If any knowledgeable person could assist, it would be greatfully appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23rd November 2009, 02:02 PM
Lukas M
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

As long as they have requested pushed back by 10.59 they are cleared to go. 11pm Curfew dosn't always mean that its wheels up by 11.01pm or your going nowhere.

Just purely a clever move in the end of things.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23rd November 2009, 02:28 PM
Phil M Phil M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Default

As long as the aircraft is receipt of a taxi clearance before 11pm local, the aircraft can depart 16R from the full length at any time.

Just to be clear, there was no dispensation required or requested. The Atlas 747 did the exact same thing last night. They had a taxi clearance at 10:59:45pm.

Whilst is was unusual to have 5 waiting to go well after midnight, the total delay for most of these aircraft was only 3 hours or so as they usually depart reasonably close to curfew.

http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/...SYNA03-110.pdf

Read: 4.4 (b) (iv)

Last edited by Phil M; 23rd November 2009 at 02:34 PM. Reason: link
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd November 2009, 06:33 PM
chrisb chrisb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 80
Default

Where do they 'park' during this? Do they keep the engine running or just go back to APU?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24th November 2009, 07:46 AM
Chris Roope Chris Roope is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 32
Default

So 5 aircraft for an hour and a half, that might be 14 engines at about 600kg an hour... 12600kg.... thats about 16000 litres of fuel just to satisfy some beurocratic crap. How many Tonnes of carbon is that I wonder?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24th November 2009, 08:05 AM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Chris,

As opposed to accommodating all the passengers overnight, in hotel rooms that were more than likely already booked, therefore transporting all passengers from 5 flights accross Sydney on buses and paying for their meals and all the other expenses that come with it? Staff overtime etc etc.

I think we can conclude the airlines did the most reasonable thing by themselves and their passengers by ensuring the flight departed.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 24th November 2009, 09:38 AM
Krzysztof M Krzysztof M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aisle seat.
Posts: 133
Default

Nick, if you read Chris's comment carefully you'll see that's exactly what he meant. Had there been no beaurocracy, the aircraft could sit at the gate with engines off and wait for the weather to clear then depart with no issues after midnight.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25th November 2009, 08:58 AM
JasonV JasonV is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 11
Default

I was onboard the EK A380. CX was ahead and QF was adjacent. We had taxiied away from the terminal and waited adjacent to the cargo terminal. I dont know the exact taxiways but outside the left side windows was the QF freight terminal so basically once we got clearance we did a 180deg right turn and took off.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement