![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From http://www.news.com.au/travel/story/...009000,00.html
Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not a surprise to me. Ever since they ordered 58 I struggled to think how they could fill that much more than anyone else. Even before the current climate.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
even 20 A380's for Qantas seems a bit much to me.....
Wouldn't 777-300ER's have been a better choice for QF? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think quite simply the airlines didn't see the economy going south in the manner it has & they imagined everyone would be flying everywhere & that they would need the capacity. I bet Virgin Atlantic are glad they deferred their order!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They wanted the capacity and the room the A380 could offer. A 777 does not even come close in terms of capacity.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just where are QF using their 380s so far?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SYD-LHR 3 times a week plus MEL and SYD to LAX.
So whats the point of your Q? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Thanks for asking. I knew QF were using the 380 to LAX (but not LHR) which to me seemed they straying somewhat from the original restricted hub strategy to more a competitive startegy using the perceived pax space of the 380 to defend the lucrative Pacific route against V Australia. Nothing sinister. What days are they flying SYD-LHR? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is QF intending to use the A380 to SFO, LAX/JFK (QF107), FRA, JNB?
I agree that they make sense on London and Los Angeles routes, but I have no idea what sort of loads are usually seen on the other USA and German/South African flights. |
![]() |
|
|