Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Technical > Flying and Technical Discussion
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th May 2009, 11:25 AM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default Detection of pitot tube and static port blockages

I had a question from a friend last night that I can't answer. What procedures are in place to detect pitot tube and static port blockages prior to departure of aircraft in high risk areas? For example if the aircraft overnights in a port where there is high insect movement etc.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11th May 2009, 11:44 AM
Daniel M Daniel M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 329
Default

nil (or minimal) airspeed increase on initial takeoff run...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11th May 2009, 11:53 AM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

I was thinking more along the lines of before the aircraft is trying to become airborne.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11th May 2009, 12:01 PM
Mick F Mick F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 853
Default

Pitot tubes are left covered, however the static vents aren't covered.

The only means of detection pre-flight is to look in the tube with the naked eye. The next mean's of detection, are as Daniel said, rolling down the runway and not noticing an increase in airspeed.

The static vents generally aren't a problem with gathering insects, as the holes are very small. In the time I have been flying, I have never had a blocked static vent as the result of an insect.

Mick
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11th May 2009, 12:18 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Say you start your take-off roll and one of the airspeed indicators is not moving will the crew reject a take-off or continue in the hope the problem will resolve itself? I assume that by continuing there will be some sort of alarm or warning? Or is it acceptable to only have one airspeed indicator working?

On that note I'd assume it would be dangerous having no second guage to cross-reference against.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11th May 2009, 12:26 PM
Michael Mak Michael Mak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 472
Default

I'd say they will reject the take off. The results could be disastrous if they continue the take off and become airborne.

See this accident with Birgenair Flight 301. The cause was a blocked pitot tube and the crew continued the take off.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birgenair_Flight_301
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2025
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement