![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting...
http://www.bitre.gov.au/publications...ber%202009.pdf On Time Arrivals: Qantas: 90.2% QantasLink: 84.9% Jetstar: 84.5% Virgin Blue: 84% Regional Ex: 80.7% Skywest: 80.3% Tiger Airways: 76.9% Cancellations: QantasLink: 0.6% Qantas: 0.7% Tiger Air: 1.7% Jetstar: 1.9% Virgin Blue: 2.2% |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought the better figures was the fact QF have the best figures for 9 of the 12 months in 2009.
http://www.qantas.com.au/regions/dyn...010/jan10/4008
__________________
Eagerly counting down to the next YSSY Spotters Weekend Last edited by Sarah C; 25th January 2010 at 05:07 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
VB would have been pulled down alot by the major IT outage in December in MEL and the onflow effects of it several days afterwards.
19 months in 2009 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the reason for the LCC's having worse OTP by a margin of around 5%?
They are meant to be more strict with policy than QF for example in order to get planes out on time and under budget. Tiger have quite strict conditions about check in etc yet they are one of the worst. I doubt they are all WX related delays. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LCC have a very tight turnaround time. So one delayed flight will delay the entire day's schedule. Whereas with Qantas, their turnaround times are longer so even if one flight is delayed, they can easily catch up.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
generally the case but not always. The most obvious sign is to look for utilisation rates of the 737 fleet as a comparison. Don't forget about aircraft swaps + fleet size as well - should it be required aircraft swaps can take place as well.
|
![]() |
|
|