Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd September 2008, 01:24 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Thought it sounded like a run-of-the-mill go around.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23rd September 2008, 02:19 PM
Karl M Karl M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 178
Default

Another thing that happens every day around the world! and the Media jump's up and down.

When is this going to stop?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23rd September 2008, 02:21 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

I wonder who the "employee with 20 years experience" was that said it was the closest thing to an accident he had seen there in his life.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23rd September 2008, 02:37 PM
damien b damien b is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickN View Post
I wonder who the "employee with 20 years experience" was that said it was the closest thing to an accident he had seen there in his life.
I'm guessing someone who didn't see the actual accidents or near misses that have occured at Sydney in the last twenty years (maybe not even an industry person?). I do recall an incident where an aircraft under tow illegally entered the runway with an aircraft on approach and cleared to land, there was also the Ansett 747 nose wheel collapse, the recent crash in Botany Bay (and many that i have forgotten or have no knowledge of)- a few in other words.

I'm surprised the media didn't report on the missed approach by a Virgin Blue aircraft on Sunday morning - with all the media there i was wondering if that would make the news. Maybe it would have, had it been a Qantas aircraft?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23rd September 2008, 02:51 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Ahh, they might have, but they were too busy looking at the great white dugung in Hangar 96!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd September 2008, 03:04 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

It does resemble a Dugong.... perhaps modelled somehow on the Baluga?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23rd September 2008, 03:17 PM
Robert Zweck Robert Zweck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 383
Default

I have done more go-arounds than I care to remember

And not one of them made the media

Which was probably because I failed to terrify my passengers
__________________
As hopeless as a Twin Comanche on one engine.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23rd September 2008, 03:17 PM
Greg McDonald Greg McDonald is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by damien b View Post
I'm surprised the media didn't report on the missed approach by a Virgin Blue aircraft on Sunday morning - with all the media there i was wondering if that would make the news. Maybe it would have, had it been a Qantas aircraft?
Or even the VERY late missed approach by a QF A330 also on Sunday....Was listening on my scanner and the pilot declared a missed approach due to a wind gust. He must have only been about 5 metres off touching down when declared as he was already over the keys.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23rd September 2008, 04:31 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Greg just out of curiosity, wouldn't it be better to continue to land an aircraft that is 15 feet off the ground rather than perform a go-around? I know nothing about go-around procedures or SOPs for the airlines but with such a small distance to the deck it seems weird to go-around.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23rd September 2008, 05:34 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickN View Post
Greg just out of curiosity, wouldn't it be better to continue to land an aircraft that is 15 feet off the ground rather than perform a go-around? I know nothing about go-around procedures or SOPs for the airlines but with such a small distance to the deck it seems weird to go-around.
Not if your wheels were over the runway edge line because of said gust...

If you're not happy with the approach profile, no matter how low, then go-around and have another crack. Better to be safe than be sorry!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2025
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement