Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 2nd April 2010, 08:09 AM
Tony G's Avatar
Tony G Tony G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Arncliffe, view of 34L
Posts: 410
Default

Nothing against airbus, however it is good to see that they stuck with the 737s. Just to keep up the variety of aircraft in Australia to choose from.
__________________
MY PHOTOS http://myaviation.net/?uid=23990 ( updated 05-11-08 )
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 2nd April 2010, 08:24 AM
Tony G's Avatar
Tony G Tony G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Arncliffe, view of 34L
Posts: 410
Default

Would be good if they followed the Braniff/Court idea as well, the current colour scheme has got me singing Split enz. If your under 30 I do not expect you to understand this post :-) .
__________________
MY PHOTOS http://myaviation.net/?uid=23990 ( updated 05-11-08 )

Last edited by Tony G; 2nd April 2010 at 08:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 2nd April 2010, 10:31 AM
Will H Will H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Grayson View Post
The -900 is still out there as dorment order.. On top of that I have found out that the only reason the T7 was not ordered for Dom Ops was the inability of SYD, BNE and MEL Dom Terminals to accept their large footprints. IATA says the T7 will take up 2.4 of their bays and they are not willing to change for us.
DJ is now looking at an infill of an 767/A330 size a/c to allow is to fly 250 ish pax on our trunk routes...
One last update from the Coffee Club is that we are ramping up to have about 140 a/c by 2015 ad onwards to 180 by 2017
It's gonna get busy.....
Had the 777 order eventuated, that would have raised a number of interesting questions: have a dedicated domestic fleet (in which case buy old -200As or -300As at good prices or buy new jets)? or interchange the a/c with V, in which case the a/c would be premium heavy for domestic routes.

The 767/330 need is a quandary. I don't see DJ going to Airbus, yet Boeing can't offer much with the 767 at the end of its life and the 787-3 all but nixed.

You can get 215 pax in a single-class config in the 739ER. Are 35 more seats worth introducing a new type of a/c?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 2nd April 2010, 05:21 PM
Jarden S Jarden S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
Default

Will they keep the E-jets or they get replaced with new 737s
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 2nd April 2010, 05:32 PM
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Interesting that the A330 is mentioned, yet again!

Can't really see them going down that path, just get the 737-900ER
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 2nd April 2010, 06:12 PM
Raymond Rowe's Avatar
Raymond Rowe Raymond Rowe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 550
Default

They are probably looking a twin aisle much quicker loading and unloading
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 2nd April 2010, 06:38 PM
lloyd fox lloyd fox is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,294
Default

The problem is Sydney parking gate availability and slots as they grow.2x A330 flights will replace 3x 737 flights etc.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 2nd April 2010, 07:55 PM
Will H Will H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew M View Post
Interesting that the A330 is mentioned, yet again!

Can't really see them going down that path, just get the 737-900ER
Quote:
[Godfrey] says there's even a business case for expanding into mid-haul aircraft such as Airbus A330s or Boeing 787s.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/busi...-1225835355948

Quote:
Originally Posted by lloyd fox View Post
The problem is Sydney parking gate availability and slots as they grow.2x A330 flights will replace 3x 737 flights etc.
Wouldn't that only be for parking, not slots?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 2nd April 2010, 08:41 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

What about if you removed Bravo-4 and extended the eastern T2 terminal finger southwards to enable 2 or 4 larger aircraft bays at the far southern end, depending on whether you kept Bays 39 and 40 for Code C aircraft or made them Code E capable?
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 2nd April 2010, 11:59 PM
Arthur T Arthur T is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 244
Default

Re Nigel:

Renewing Qantas' Boeing 737 Fleet does not mean getting new planes to replace them, but I mean they should have their interior refurnished to install AVOD and a more comfortable seating.

Furthermore, Qantas should stop waiting for those 7Late7s and consider other options including to order 20 B77E to replace B76W, where these B77Es can be deployed to more European or ex-NZ Transpacific service and to replace some early A333s in the future. I think if QF can order these B77Es they can come within a year or two, which they will be fitted with new product and should be able to beat Virgin Blue.
__________________
Upcoming Services

CX138 SYD-HKG
CX101 HKG-SYD
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2025
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement