Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Spotting and Movements > Spotting and Movements
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 5th January 2009, 08:50 PM
Grahame Hutchison's Avatar
Grahame Hutchison Grahame Hutchison is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney's Eastern Suburbs - View From Bondi To Jibbon Point And Bravo 10 South
Posts: 8,533
Default

Yep to the time difference and other factors, but I had trouble finding a B747 any closer than that. Maybe another day.
__________________
Joined 1999 @www16Right FlightDiary Airliners Web QR Retired PPL C150/172 PA28-161/181 Pitts S-2B SIM: 12Hr QF B767 B744 CX B742 Nikon D100-D200-D300-D500
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 6th January 2009, 05:35 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grahame Hutchison View Post
Yep to the time difference and other factors, but I had trouble finding a B747 any closer than that. Maybe another day.
Cheers Mate.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 6th January 2009, 08:09 AM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Would there be much of an altitude difference at those points between the
B747 and the A380? I know it's an assumption but wouldn't the A380 be at a slightly lower altitude?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 6th January 2009, 04:15 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickN View Post
I know it's an assumption but wouldn't the A380 be at a slightly lower altitude?
Why?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 7th January 2009, 09:33 AM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

It's a huge aircraft, and thought it could possibly be a hundred or so feet lower than a 747 at that stage. As I said, just an assumption.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 7th January 2009, 11:18 AM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Perhaps, but the A380 has huge wings that generate a lot of lift, plus it's engines would probably give it a competitive power to weight ratio to the B747.

Being a new generation aircraft and keeping in line with the environmentally friendly tag that Airbus have given it, one might suspect that it would actually be 100' or more higher than the older generation B747 at the same level if both were to operate at MTOW.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 7th January 2009, 12:30 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Very true Nigel.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 7th January 2009, 12:42 PM
Carl F Carl F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel C View Post
Perhaps, but the A380 has huge wings that generate a lot of lift, plus it's engines would probably give it a competitive power to weight ratio to the B747.

Being a new generation aircraft and keeping in line with the environmentally friendly tag that Airbus have given it, one might suspect that it would actually be 100' or more higher than the older generation B747 at the same level if both were to operate at MTOW.
Hi Nigel,
I was also reading in an edition of Australian Aviation that during testing takeoff the A380 can get away with using approx 80% throttle (may want to correct me here) as the engines are that powerfull. Good lift from the wings and less throttle would produce less noise I would think.

Cheers
Carl
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 7th January 2009, 12:45 PM
Carl F Carl F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grahame Hutchison View Post
Carl, I am currently using the Nikon D300 which I think is a beautiful camera to use (previously had a D100 then D200). The lens for the night shots was the Nikkor AF-S DX 17-55mm f2.8G IF ED (tripod mounted and shutter release using the timer), and most of my aviation photography is done using the AF-S 70-200mm f2.8G IF ED VR (sometimes with the 1.4 Teleconverter and occasionally the 2.0).

Nick, The noise readings came from the new WebTrak, have a look at http://syd.webtrak-lochard.com/template/index.html
Hi Grahame,
Lucky you, I am hoping to upgrade my D70 to a D90 with the 18-105VR shortly. Unfortunately I can not afford the 70-200 f2.8 lens.

Cheers
Carl
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement