#1
|
|||
|
|||
International laws
G'day all,
For international flights that don't originate or terminate in Australia but which are Australian-registered, under whose laws these are these flights conducted? What are some examples of how international aviation laws differ from domestic legislation? By the way this - rarely - has nothing to do with an assignment . Cheers Ed |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
An example would be LAX-JFK for QF if you are looking for one, and vice versa for united, SYD-MEL.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ed, as far as I understand, if a VH registered aircraft is operating overseas, then it is operating under Australian Law. Same for other countries as well.
On a semi related note, if a baby were to be born on an Australian registered aircraft, then that baby is then a citizen of the country, . I can't think of the actual Reg, but it'd be under the CAR's 1988 or CASR's 1998. Cheers Mick |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
The law of the aircraft in flight
For the most part the aircraft is subject to the law of the jurisdiction whose airspace it occupies. So, for example, a murder committed on a QF sector between LAX and JFK would be governed by the criminal law of the state over which the aircraft was flying at the time the offence was committed. If this could not be ascertained US federal law would apply in respect of a crime committed on an aircraft.
The position is different over international waters where no jurisdiction has any particular nexus claim. In those circumstances, as is the case also with ships and spacecraft, the flag carrier jurisdiction applies. Overlay all this with various international conventions that govern specifics like what law applies to a satellite in geostationary orbit, what law governs contracts made on a ship or aircraft, what law governs liability for aircraft accidents, etc.
__________________
Philip |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Can I please have an explanation as to the relevance of Rhys' post? I had my statement deleted, yet Rhys' irrelevant post remains?
Mick |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
This applies only to civil aircraft, state owned or operated aircraft are not subject to the same jurisdiction... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
One of those UNSW students... you know what I mean |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the help guys. ICAO never fails to impress!
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
in fact these flights are not examples as they are domestic routes within a country, a more pertinent example Rhys would be BKK-LHR, between 2 sovereign countries. Banjo
__________________
used to fly globally on business, now retired Last edited by Andrew P; 10th June 2008 at 07:33 AM. Reason: as seen someone else questioned Rhys' post |
|
|