Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > International Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27th March 2008, 08:34 PM
Andrew McLaughlin's Avatar
Andrew McLaughlin Andrew McLaughlin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash W View Post
So how many times now has the a/c gone u/s?
Three in six months... not too bad for a new type.
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27th March 2008, 10:03 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew McLaughlin View Post
Three in six months... not too bad for a new type.
In fact you could well say it is pretty good. I imagine one of the 'faults' was the one where they backed it onto the grass.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28th March 2008, 11:40 AM
Shameel Kumar Shameel Kumar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Now in Central California
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew McLaughlin View Post
Three in six months... not too bad for a new type.
Very true, that's pretty good for a 6 month timeframe... but when you consider the fact that throughout those 6 months virtually only 2 A380's have been in service (the third was only very recently delivered)..well then the numbers aren't so impressive.

But on the whole, seems like the A380 is a very reliable aircraft...which is the way it should be in this day and age of technology!

Just out of curiousity, how did the 777 go in terms of in-service reliability when it began flying in June of '95?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28th March 2008, 01:50 PM
Adam P. Adam P. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On two wheels
Posts: 570
Default

Aeroplanes are complex beasts. They break. ALL THE TIME! It's a fact of life for any airline.

The thing is, this one has such a high profile that everyone is watching closely.... both aircraft are being fully utilised, so it is very difficult to swap to another tail number. Because there are only two of them even your average man on the street can tell that a swap's been done, when they expect a great big whopping A380 and instead get a crappy old 747.


The point, once I finally reach it, is that many people don't know what goes on around aeroplanes and airlines on a daily basis. What's happening to SQ is perfectly normal with such a complex system - it's just that the big ugly French thing is so new that people are watching!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28th March 2008, 02:27 PM
David Ramsay David Ramsay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 405
Default

Quote:
Because there are only two of them
Arithmetic 101

one, two, three!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28th March 2008, 03:38 PM
Shameel Kumar Shameel Kumar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Now in Central California
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam P. View Post
- it's just that the big ugly French thing is so new that people are watching!
Very true..but in the case of the media they have 24/7 surveillance on the A380 with a huge magnifying lense, waiting at a moments notice to make a drama out of the A380 running over a caterpillar.
I'm suprised they haven't made a big fuss whenever the A380 arrives into SYD 10 minutes later than scheduled.

Apart from the fuel-pump issues, the only other 'problems' I've heard so far are the dirtiness of the first A380 during the first few weeks of service, and also the quietness of the cabin meaning passengers can hear the aircraft's plumbing at work.

Excellent work by Airbus to make the aircraft so reliable!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28th March 2008, 03:45 PM
Adam P. Adam P. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On two wheels
Posts: 570
Default

Quote:
one, two, three!!

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28th March 2008, 04:58 PM
Brenden S Brenden S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,079
Default

Hmm 2nd time for a fuel pump issue. I wonder when SKC will get this problem.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29th March 2008, 03:26 AM
Olle Q Olle Q is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 40
Default

Well folks, just look back and remember how the 747 behaved the first months in full service........
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29th March 2008, 06:55 AM
Grant Smith Grant Smith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere between YSSY & LLBG - God's Country
Posts: 774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olle Q View Post
Well folks, just look back and remember how the 747 behaved the first months in full service........
Can't say I was around way back then... Maybe some of the more "senior" members of the board can enlighten the less senior members

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement