|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
you would think that if someone's passport was stolen last year then this would alert passport controls in all countries to be extra vigilant when a passenger shows up with that passport , also the passport number should show up as stolen once scanned . And once the genuine owner of the passport has their passport re-issued they would need to provide additional proof of id each time checking in and going through security if needed ,
An italian and an Austrian both had their passports stolen while in Thailand last year ? ( according to BBC ) sounds a bit odd , I travelled through Thailand / Singapore and Malaysia last year , and in my opinion the only weak link was thailand .... Singapore and Malaysia are very strict with passport controls and its hard to believe in this day and age that people still get away with travelling on false passports . if that is indeed what has happened |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Now the FBI is involved
Ostensibly on the grounds that US citizens were on the aircraft, but I'm not sure the FBI gets involved as a matter of course ...
__________________
Philip |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
There could not have been any fuel issues with the aircraft, as it would have flown for quite some time regardless, and communications would have been received from the pilot.
Something sudden and catastrophic has happened which prevented time for any communications from the pilots. Something else to be considered would be the aircraft having been overpowered, and flown into the sea intentionally, also explaining the no communications. We will find out... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Crickey Update:
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalk...ion-imprecise/ Looks like an AF447 scenario. Does the B777 has telemetry output similar to the A330/380 etc. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Any ACARS?
As with AF447, the ACARS telemetry could give us vital clues. Maybe MAS doesn't want to share it at this stage ... ?
__________________
Philip |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
A couple of ways it's different to AF447 - no reports of significant weather in the area, a very experienced crew at the controls (presumably) and no reports of telemetry (which was revealed hours after AF447 was confirmed missing).
The other thing I find bizarre is that despite good ADS and ATC radar coverage (reportedly) there have only been unconfirmed reports of a rapid descent - you'd think even from 35,000ft if the aircraft was falling in a single piece they would have had a couple of radar returns in that time? Thankfully the Gulf of Thailand is relatively shallow so it should make recovery of the wreckage somewhat easier than AF447. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why didn't Vietnam/Chinese ATC raise an alert when the aircraft:
* failed to report at way points * could no longer be seen on radar |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
How do you know they didn't?
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting development with the two passengers travelling on false passports. Why would they book on the same flight to Europe on Saturday, if they intended to hijack or destroy the aircraft. Maybe this is just illegal use of passports, and unrelated to the accident.
__________________
Joined 1999 @www16Right FlightDiary Airliners Web QR Retired PPL C150/172 PA28-161/181 Pitts S-2B SIM: 12Hr QF B767 B744 CX B742 Nikon D100-D200-D300-D500 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Being purchased at the same time
Ticket numbers being in sequence I think this is more than just using illegal passports to get somewhere. There saying it could be timed to fit with the opening of parliment. Take a look at www.marinetraffic.com quite a few ships out looking. |
|
|