Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Spotting and Movements > Spotting and Movements


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 29th November 2011, 02:08 AM
Jarden S Jarden S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
Default

I think its buraquazie gone mad.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29th November 2011, 11:19 AM
Bob C Bob C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 687
Default

Hi Jarden

Is "buraquazie" a new word Jarden as I can't find it in any dictionary ?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29th November 2011, 11:24 AM
NeilP NeilP is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bexley, NSW. 10mins from YSSY
Posts: 209
Default

"Buraquazie" is in my dickshunry...
__________________
Cheers,
NeilP
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29th November 2011, 03:29 PM
Jarden S Jarden S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
Default

I knew it was wrong after I posted it. I don't have spell check on my computer it would have helped.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 21st December 2011, 06:50 PM
Jarden S Jarden S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
Default An interesting follow up article on this issue:

Quote:
Capacity constraints at Sydney
Airport must be addressed if New
South Wales is to have any chance
of reaching its ambitious tourism
targets by 2020, a report has
insisted.
The Tourism and Transport
Forum (TTF) has tabled a number
of aviation measures which it
believes are pivotal for the state to
achieve its aims.
Without them the plan, which
includes the doubling of overnight
visitor spend, will struggle.
In a 28-page submission to the
NSW Industry Action Plan, the
TTF labelled the arbitrary cap of 80
movements per hour as the “single
biggest constraint at Sydney
Airport”.
“During peak hours this limit
is consistently met, leading to an
increase in aircraft delays which
build up during the peak hour,” the
TTF said. “The cap also limits the
attractiveness of Sydney Airport
as a destination to new entrant
airlines.”

It called on the government to
review the “artificial constraints”
and be “bold enough to re-open
the debate and broker discussion
between local communities, the
Federal Government and the
airport”.
The TTF said it was aware of
“technological, aeronautical and
air traffic management solutions”
which could limit noise. They
include incentivising the new
generation of fuel efficient quieter
aircraft, such as the A380, 777-
300ER and 787-800, to operate to
Sydney.
While stopping short of
calling for the curfew at Sydney
to be lifted, the TTF said there
also needs to be “increased
dispensation parameters for the
curfew to include weather and
technical events”.
“Such a measure will reduce
the risk profile of Sydney Airport
among some carriers in terms of
being grounded or passengers
missing connection due to curfew,”
it said.
The lobby group also
recommended that slots would
free up if freight and private jets
no longer use Sydney Airport.
It argued that other major hubs
around the world have already
taken such steps.
“To this end the NSW
Government should support efforts
by Bankstown Airport to upgrade
its runway to accommodate Boeing
737-sized freighters and larger
business jets,” the TTF said in its
submission.
In addition, Newcastle and
Canberra should be used for
medium haul international
services and “championed as a
gateway to the south.
www.traveltoday.com
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 21st December 2011, 07:45 PM
Greg McDonald Greg McDonald is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 723
Default

Great idea and it should happen but no government will ever have the ba11s to make any of these changes unfortunately.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 21st December 2011, 08:13 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Vote 1, me for PM!
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 21st December 2011, 10:15 PM
Bernie P's Avatar
Bernie P Bernie P is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western Sydney
Posts: 852
Default

Got my vote Nigel, and I'll even go and vote twice if it gets you over the line!!
__________________
----------

My Flight Diary

My Photos Flickr Images
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 21st December 2011, 11:24 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

I'd only be after 1 term in office, but there'd be changes everywhere!
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 22nd December 2011, 10:56 AM
Shayne G Shayne G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 6 mins flying time out of 34L
Posts: 653
Default

Nigel, scrap the noisy jet ban and 80 movements an hour cap and you got yourself another vote!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement