Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Spotting and Movements > Spotting and Movements
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 7th October 2008, 04:24 PM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,402
Default

I noticed 604 on the General Aviation apron this morning - seemingly fixed?
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 7th October 2008, 07:16 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

It was, but the tug that towed it to the international this afternoon sprung a coolant leak just as it was crossing Rwy 16R, thus resulting in the runway being closed for a short time for the recovery of the tug and aircraft.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 7th October 2008, 07:22 PM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,402
Default

I suppose the word "jinxed" has no place on a technically precise and objective forum like this ...

And surely a coolant leak can be ignored for the amount of time it would have taken to tow the a/c clear of the RWY? So what if the tug overheats for an extra minute?
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 7th October 2008, 08:05 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

It was the appearance of what they thought was 'smoke' that made them stop, and they didn't want to risk the thing by running it any hotter than it was already getting.

I don't imagine the engines on those tugs would be cheap to repair or replace!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 7th October 2008, 08:09 PM
Anthony J Anthony J is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel C View Post
It was, but the tug that towed it to the international this afternoon sprung a coolant leak just as it was crossing Rwy 16R, thus resulting in the runway being closed for a short time for the recovery of the tug and aircraft.
Ah, that would explain the sudden slow down we recieved for RW16L on QFA46 with RW16R closed due disabled aircraft! It wound up being a 330kt descent to RW34R.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 7th October 2008, 08:28 PM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel C View Post
It was the appearance of what they thought was 'smoke' that made them stop, and they didn't want to risk the thing by running it any hotter than it was already getting.

I don't imagine the engines on those tugs would be cheap to repair or replace!
So it was all fine when they got clearance to cross 16R, yet between when they started to cross 16R and before they had cleared 16R it became impossible to complete the crossing?

Maybe I'd better resurrect the "jinxed" word!
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement