Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > International Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #12  
Old 17th November 2009, 09:14 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

I was comparing to this impression of a 787 which is a 787-3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Boeing_787-3.jpg

Now they look very similar, but clearly the pics of the production 787 show how different it really is.

Also your pictures clearly show it isn't 747-8 like either, and personaly I think it is more blended and swept than those on the 737, so there goes the theory that Phil and Nick had that the design was stolen from Boeing.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 18th November 2009, 06:55 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

It's no accident they look similar

A: Aviations partners did the work on the Airbus version and Boeing Aviation partners did the Boeing models

and B: As with almost anything involved with evolutionary design, there is a perfect design somewhere (especially with aerodynamics) and as each design gets closer to it, the more similar they look.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 18th November 2009, 07:44 AM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Lighten up Ash we were just making a light hearted joke.

The photo Bernie linked to of the test A320, the winglets do look amazingly similar to that on the 737. They don't look shark-fin like at all.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 18th November 2009, 10:16 AM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,403
Default

My comment related to the linked photograph of a distinctly Boeing-like upswept wing tip which looks nothing remotely like the familiar Airbus 'sharklet'.

I simply observed that if Airbus had announced a new design of the kind depicted, it was distinctly Boeing-like. If Boeing's design in turn is based on something developed by McDonnell Douglas, then happy to acknowledge that but it wasn't the point of my observation.
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 18th November 2009, 12:32 PM
Chris B. Chris B. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 104
Default

How about from this angle?

Courtesy of flightlife.wordpress.com

Last edited by Chris B.; 18th November 2009 at 04:59 PM. Reason: Added URL
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 18th November 2009, 01:08 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Good angle Chris, much more "fin" like there. But the word sharklet to me means something on a smaller scale, not something 2.4m long.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement