Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 28th May 2008, 08:07 AM
Chris Roope Chris Roope is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 32
Default

All engines are at idle at touchdown anyway, so I dont see what difference it would have made doing the approach without 1&4?

I also suspect that doing an intentional 2 engined approach would be operating outside the flight manual ceritification. If you prang an aeroplane while intentionally operating outside the 'envelope' then you would have some fantastic lawsuits coming your way.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29th May 2008, 02:09 AM
Ben W Ben W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 141
Default

One other question- Is it true that the seats were all removed for the flight to cut weight and then reinstalled in Longreach?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29th May 2008, 03:39 PM
Scott Lindsell Scott Lindsell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben W View Post
Thanks for the link. I was always under the impression that she landed with 1&4 on idle as well, but my friend insists they were all turning at the same speed? The video doesn't really prove either of us wrong so I guess we'll continue to argue about it for now! lol

Cheers,

Ben
Hey Ben,
Are you the Ben W I think you are???
Scott.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 30th May 2008, 11:39 AM
Bill S Bill S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 93
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick F View Post
She'll never leave Longreach. Never.

Only way it can possibly leave Longreach is if they were to extend the runway to enable it.

Mick
It's possible to get a very light 747 off the ground in a little over a 1000 metres ground roll.

I seriously doubt they had #1 and #4 shutdown, there's no charts or approval to do that, that I've ever heard of.
If you don't want FOD ingestion into the engines, then just don't use reverse - They were very light and in a Classic you can use a lot of braking when light and the brakes will be okay.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 30th May 2008, 11:45 AM
Mick F Mick F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 852
Default

Thanks for the info Bill.

I was simply going off what I was told during a visit to the museum last year.

Cheers

Mick
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 31st May 2008, 03:32 AM
Paul C. Paul C. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 92
Default

I think that VH-EBQ will spend the rest of its life fading away in the desert with the original VH-(X)EBA, first Qantas 707.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 31st May 2008, 10:37 AM
Nick W.'s Avatar
Nick W. Nick W. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 206
Default

We were all amazed at how EBQ landed quite far down the runway, compared to our 738, which had quite a force when slowing down and pretty much hit the piano keys.

On the video, you can see me at 20s (left of screen, black hat, white shirt) and my dad (right of screen, blue hat and white shirt).

my favourite photo which i took of that landing:

http://www.rwy34.com/search/bigpic.php?id=3228&size=L

N
__________________
One of those UNSW students... you know what I mean
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 31st May 2008, 11:51 AM
Chris Tully Chris Tully is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 92
Default

I can confirm all engines were running during the landing phase.

As confirmed by the Captain who operated the flight
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 31st May 2008, 12:02 PM
Steve S... 2 Steve S... 2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 616
Default

Couldn't agree more about the appearance of the 747 compared to A380.

We have a new queen of the skies and as good an aircraft as it probably is, it is damn ugly. The sadest day ever in aviation history was when the Boeing 747 was superceded and Boeing should have put up more of a fight with the 747-800...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement