Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 14th February 2019, 07:54 AM
David C David C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tahmoor NSW
Posts: 377
Default

It begs the question as the the complexities of repairing a carbon fibre airframe compared to a conventional type .
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14th February 2019, 06:34 PM
MarkR MarkR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,150
Default

The Ethiopian repair did give some clues :

http://old.seattletimes.com/html/bus...repairxml.html
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15th February 2019, 11:23 AM
David C David C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tahmoor NSW
Posts: 377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick F View Post
Accidents happen. Itís not what I would call major damage.
Minor damage on a 737 can turn out to be major damage on a 787 . A repair taking maybe a day on a conventional type can turn into weeks on a carbon fibre airframe . As more 787ís enter service , this incidence will obviously become more commonplace .
Dave C
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17th February 2019, 12:08 PM
C Patters C Patters is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 136
Default

ZNG back in service today operating MEL-HKG
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2016
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement