View Single Post
  #17  
Old 5th November 2009, 08:56 PM
Blair M Blair M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew View Post
I guess the only issue while the fleet numbers are low is operational recovery should a 777 go belly-up in NAN. I am assuming there isn't much fat in the rotations to allow for significant delays?

Hitting the Trans-Pac services could be costly considering this market is more important to V then Fiji from a yield and market share perspective.

OTP is the number 1 consumer driver for satisfaction over all aspects of the end-to-end experience.
It is a commercial risk - but not a major one. The 777 is extreemly reliable.

It's the same issue for most airlines that fly to ports without major engineering coverage. JQ & QF also hit these hurdles and regurlaly.

There is 2h5m turn around in SYD ex LAX, 1h25m in NAN ex SYD & 2h35m in SYD ex NAN. Plenty of slack should there be delays. Crew hour limitations are to be more of a factor should a pro-longed weather or technical delay occur. But ofcourse nothing is ever fool proof.
Reply With Quote