Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 8th April 2010, 08:24 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

Adam how do you meassure safety? To me there is no one metric, so it cannot actually be meassured, which leaves it unfortunatly to perception.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 8th April 2010, 10:14 PM
D Chan D Chan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ash W View Post
Adam how do you meassure safety? To me there is no one metric, so it cannot actually be meassured, which leaves it unfortunatly to perception.
whilst there is no one metric, there are many indicators (hundreds) that can be used (the public won't know of course). I actually think it is theoretically possible to measure it (extremely complex) but it's not economically feasible, extremely time consuming and has to be done by an independent body that has access to internal safety information within airlines (to which some airlines won't agree to). So whilst it can be done it will never be done.

For a start if an airline adopts industry best practices in safety - this alone will make a pretty big difference. Pitch this against cash-strapped airlines from 3rd-world countries and it becomes fairly obvious.

Yet all of these will count for nothing if a flock of birds causes a fatal birdstrike event (knocking out all engines) or there was a mid-air collision such as the DHL 757 and the Tu154 a few years ago in Europe. It can happen to any airline, and completely outside their control, no matter how 'safe' they are.


In terms of the recent media scrutiny it has been amazing to see the amount of rubbish-reporting. In particular, QF has been singled out on some of the common issues that affect airlines operating around the world day in day. To keep things short if another airline in Australia have similar issues to QF's and it goes unnoticed you really have to question why QF has been singled out.

For example, CASA's flight safety publication includes a list of SDRs (Service Difficulty Reports) http://www.casa.gov.au/wcmswr/_asset.../mar-apr10.pdf, and the ATSB publishes weekly summaries: http://www.atsb.gov.au/aviation/week...mary/2010.aspx

There are plenty of issues that go unreported, and unoticed, day in day out. Take a look yourself

Obviously either the media hasn't done their homework or they are all 'cashing in' to the new found obsession (intended to give them more 'clicks' or 'hits' to their stories). To the uninformed this creates an exceptionally bad (and perhaps unwarranted) perception.


And then there's the issue with the Union's claims about poor overseas maintenance standards - the very same used by global carriers like Lufthansa or Singapore Airlines. We never hear the unions warning the public not to fly these airlines, and since they don't, isn't it fairly obvious why they make a huge fuss about these critical safety issues?

Last edited by D Chan; 8th April 2010 at 11:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 9th April 2010, 09:20 AM
Paul McFarlane's Avatar
Paul McFarlane Paul McFarlane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YMTG
Posts: 147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam G View Post
Take an airline like Southwest for example - a fleet size of 540ish, a lot of very short sectors and in almost 40 years of operation still hasn't had a fatal event occur.
What about Southwest flight 1248 on December 8, 2005 that killed the boy on the ground. Granted it wasn't a maintenance issue, but it was still an unfortunate fatal accident.
__________________
Things ain't what they used to be!

Last edited by Paul McFarlane; 9th April 2010 at 09:22 AM. Reason: Speeling :)
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 9th April 2010, 01:49 PM
Andrew P's Avatar
Andrew P Andrew P is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: near the old NDB at West Pymble and near RPLR
Posts: 749
Default

MESSAGE ON EASTER DISRUPTIONS FROM QANTAS CEO ALAN JOYCE

Joyce has issued pretty strong comments, here are just some

Quote:
Qantas has recently experienced major disruptions to our international network. You may have been affected directly or indirectly by the disruptions, or seen the media coverage and speculation about Qantas safety and maintenance standards.

As one of our valued customers, I wanted to be in touch with you directly about this. I want to apologise if you were affected personally by the disruptions. I know that Easter is a special opportunity to unite family and friends, and I sincerely regret any frustration and anxiety you may have experienced due to the delays.

.....

The first thing to say about each of the four incidents is that safety was never an issue. These were mechanical issues: at no time did they represent safety threats....
good to see QF are at least addressing the press
__________________
used to fly globally on business, now retired
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 9th April 2010, 02:34 PM
Sarah C Sarah C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wishing I was under a flightpath
Posts: 1,355
Default

It was a great letter from Joyce. He was honest and provided facts that everyone could understand.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 9th April 2010, 03:33 PM
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Great PR !

10/10 for Qantas for doing that!

0/10 for the media publishing it all in the first place.

Funny how the United Airlines near miss a few weeks back only got a small mention.

http://www.news.com.au/travel/news/u...-1225847786869

THE US National Transportation Safety Board has launched an investigation into how a commercial jet came within 300 feet of a mid-air collision with small airplane over San Francisco on Saturday.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10th April 2010, 10:35 AM
Ryan K. Ryan K. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Default

About time for Mr. Joyce to come out and say something. Him being such an out spoken person, it was only a matter of time to see him addressing the customers about the reliability issues.

The message was well address and clarifies concerns for the travelling public. Only comment is maybe he should advertise more on the schedule of their 747 fleet upgrade to 380.

At the end of the day, you can't dodge these kind of media reports, you can only steer how the public thinks about your airline. Final words is this guy really know how to do business.

Last edited by Ryan K.; 10th April 2010 at 10:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10th April 2010, 01:41 PM
Sarah C Sarah C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wishing I was under a flightpath
Posts: 1,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan K. View Post
About time for Mr. Joyce to come out and say something. Him being such an out spoken person, it was only a matter of time to see him addressing the customers about the reliability issues.
What reliability issues? Two engines had surges which are rare occurances, it is just unlucky they happened so close together.

If a CEO issued this letter for everything that goes wrong everyday to thier airline, they would be doing it daily. Aircraft are machines - things go wrong, airlines do all they can to prevent them, sometimes things just happen.

Joyce isn't outspoken - he is honest when people ask him questions. I think he handled it really well - responding to every delay is over the top and only feeds the frenzy.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10th April 2010, 02:36 PM
Andrew McLaughlin's Avatar
Andrew McLaughlin Andrew McLaughlin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan K. View Post
Only comment is maybe he should advertise more on the schedule of their 747 fleet upgrade to 380.
They did that just recently, in great detail, at their half-yearly results media briefing, and this was widely reported. But exact dates can't be given, especially with Airbus's continually lagging A380 delivery schedule.

From my experience, Alan Joyce is fundamentally an honest and decent guy who is battling that ever present balance between customers, employees and shareholders, whilst at the same time trying to bring a 'jobs for life' culture kicking and screaming into the 21st century.
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 14th April 2010, 07:16 PM
Michael Cleary Michael Cleary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney and Taipei
Posts: 197
Default V Australia have a turn - but not reported

Strange how (and what) the press report isnt it!!

It seems that V Australia suffered a delay of about 18 hours at Phuket last Friday (09/04) due to an engine problem at startup.

According to a colleague from work who was on it, (VA20, 18:40 from Phuket to Melbourne), all went well until engine start, at which time one of the engines made some unusual noises. Back to the gate and to hotels for the night, finally arriving in Melbourne at around 23:30 on Saturday night - rather naturally too late to go on to Sydney, so they paid for a short stay in one of the Hotels.

And not a word in the press from what I (didnt) see.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2025
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement