Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 18th July 2010, 05:44 PM
Jason H Jason H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 644
Default

yeah NAIPS is down at the moment too.....I need it too!
__________________
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your head turned skywards; for there you have been and there you long to return"
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 18th July 2010, 11:07 PM
Chris W Chris W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 129
Default

NAIPS and the Online Briefing service were down from about 1320 until 1830, reason unknown. The poor guys at the Brisbane Briefing office would have earnt their wage and then some this afternoon.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 5th September 2010, 08:09 AM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,403
Question How much cross wind is tolerable

Surprised to see 34 still in use with Xwinds gusting to 26 knots (and I'd estimate higher than that myself) - what's the usual limit?

Quote:
ATIS ATIS YSSY B 042141
APCH: EXP INDEPENDENT VISUAL APCH
RWY: 34L AND R FOR ARRS AND DEPS
OPR INFO: PARL RWY OPS IN PROG.
INDEPENDENT DEPARTURES IN PROG
+ WIND: 300/25-40, XW MN 17, MAX 26
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 5th September 2010, 08:37 AM
David C David C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tahmoor NSW
Posts: 509
Default

The X wind limits vary from aircraft to aircraft and also depends on other factors as runway surface conditions . I read that the 787 will have a typical X wind limit of around 25Kts , a little on the low side I would have thought .

Dave C
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 5th September 2010, 08:58 AM
James Smith James Smith is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cherrybrook NSW
Posts: 1,368
Default

Philip, with the wind at a steady 300 degrees the crosswind on the 34 runways is still less than runway 25, so if a type of aircraft is not able to land in that crosswind, due to exceeding limits, would need to go around and try again, or as a last resort divert. Will make for some great photos though today with all the fathers trying out their new cameras and/or lenses.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 6th September 2010, 07:10 PM
Chris W Chris W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 129
Default

They usually start looking at the option of 25/07 only with a crosswind between 20-25 knots. Of course it depends on the time of day and the traffic loads though.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12th December 2010, 09:10 AM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,403
Question 34R GP and DME problems

ATIS right now has this:

Quote:
RWY 34R GP AND DME NOT AVBL, DO NOT USE - FALSE INDICATIONS POSSIBLE
The unavailability of GP and DME for 34R has been notified for weeks, but this is the first time I've seen the "DO NOT USE" advisory with the "FALSE INDICATIONS" warning. What exactly is the problem with 34R GP and DME and why is it taking so long to fix??
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12th December 2010, 09:46 AM
JamesW JamesW is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 94
Default

Hi Phillip,

AsA are currently replacing the whole ILS system for 16L/34R and 34R has been chosen to be the one which is replaced first. Here is the AIP AIC of the replacement: http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/...up/a10-h19.pdf. It says the new ILS should be commisioned around the 17DEC10. You may of also heard ADA01('Auscar 1') flying around Sydney, and this is the navaid testing aircraft, and also helps with the alignment of the System. The 16L ILS system will be next, and therefore you will see that in the ATIS when the 16's are active. Also the use of LOC Y is due to the approach using DME referencing to the SY DME and not the LOC DME. Hope this answers your questions
__________________
Kind Regards,

C172 GFPT Student
Aviation Enthusiast
Sydney, Australia
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12th December 2010, 10:13 AM
Phil M Phil M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Default

Philip,

The difference yesterday morning is that the ILS was actually turned on to allow Auscal to do the commissioning flights. Once the ILS was on, but NAVBL to be used, the "do not use, false indications possible" phrase needs to be added to the CATIS.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12th December 2010, 10:30 AM
Mick F Mick F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 852
Default

James, the callsign is "Auscal 1", not "Auscar 1".

Cheers

Mick
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement