Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th November 2010, 01:08 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

It was OEI and it landed around 1320.

It's amazing how the Qantas return gets mentioned, but nothing of the other international airline that performed an air return not that long before it....
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)

Last edited by Nigel C; 15th November 2010 at 01:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15th November 2010, 01:22 PM
Adrian B Adrian B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 668
Default

Thanks Nigel, What time was the other return, I ddint hear that one. In prep of the 'completely uneventful' return of QF17, there was another a/c (not mentioning the carrier) that requested to stay on approach to 16R due to a warning light on departure from YMML.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15th November 2010, 01:26 PM
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Default

119 passengers......
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15th November 2010, 02:14 PM
Ryan K Ryan K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew M View Post
119 passengers......
Hmm, 199 passengers does not speak well of this route!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15th November 2010, 03:31 PM
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan K View Post
Hmm, 199 passengers does not speak well of this route!
AH yes sorry 199 passengers!!!

Still not a good load at all!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15th November 2010, 03:41 PM
Rich W Rich W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 67
Default

First it's Airbus... then Boeing... THATS IT! I'm only going to fly on Russian made jets from now on!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15th November 2010, 01:34 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrian B View Post
Thanks Nigel, What time was the other return, I ddint hear that one.
It was sometime between 1130 and 1200 I think.
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15th November 2010, 02:00 PM
Geoff W Geoff W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 178
Default

Gee QF are really getting battered from pillar to post at the minute.

Kind regards,

Geoff


From The Age:

Quote:
Qantas flight turns back to Sydney
Paul Tatnell and Glenda Kwek
November 15, 2010 - 2:47PM

A Qantas plane en route to Argentina has been forced to return to Sydney after an electrical problem led to smoke in the cockpit, the fifth in-flight or pre-flight incident since an engine failure on a Singapore-bound A380 flight 11 days ago.


QF17, which took off from Sydney Airport at 11.11am today with 199 passengers on board, turned back about an hour into the flight to Buenos Aires, a Qantas spokeswoman said.
Advertisement: Story continues below

A friend of one of the passengers said the pilot announced there was smoke coming from the instrument panel.

A Qantas spokesman confirmed an electrical problem had caused the smoke.

The Boeing 747-400, with three flight and 18 cabin crew, touched down safely at Sydney Airport at 1.22pm after priority clearance to land was given by air traffic control, a Qantas spokesman said.

"Engineers are inspecting the aircraft to determine the cause of the issue. Passengers have disembarked into the terminal building," the spokesman said.

"Reports that the aircraft lost pressure in the main cabin are incorrect. Oxygen supply to the cabin was unaffected."

The spokesman said the incident was reported to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and the Air Transport Safety Bureau.

"Qantas regrets the inconvenience to passengers and will seek to make contingency arrangements for those affected."

A replacement flight would leave Sydney at 5pm, the spokesman said.

On Saturday, a missing screw delayed a Qantas flight from Sydney to Melbourne by an hour, while a QantasLink flight to Sydney from Coffs Harbour was delayed by five hours after a warning light indicated a problem with the engines as it came in to land.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15th November 2010, 02:05 PM
Kurt A Kurt A is offline
YSSY Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YSSY
Posts: 968
Default

Quote:
QANTAS STATEMENT ON QF17
SYDNEY, 15 November 2010:


Qantas Flight 17 from Sydney to Buenos Aires today, operated by a Boeing 747, returned to Sydney after experiencing an issue with the aircraft’s electrical system.

The aircraft departed at 11:11am and landed safely back at Sydney Airport at 1:22pm. Priority clearance to land was gained from air traffic control, following procedure. There were 199 passengers, three flight crew and 18 cabin crew on board.

Engineers are inspecting the aircraft to determine the cause of the issue. Passengers have disembarked into the terminal building. Reports that the aircraft had lost pressure in the main cabin are incorrect. Oxygen supply to the cabin was unaffected. The incident has been reported to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and the Air Transport Safety Bureau.

The flight crew operating the service acted appropriately in line with their training and with Qantas’ safety-first approach. Qantas regrets the inconvenience to passengers and will seek to make contingency arrangements for those affected.

Further details will be released as they become available.
-qf
__________________
YSSY Forum Administrator
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15th November 2010, 02:10 PM
Geoff W Geoff W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 178
Default

Quote:
"It was OEI and it landed around 1320.

It's amazing how the Qantas return gets mentioned, but nothing of the other international airline that performed an air return not that long before it...."
Nigel,

I reckon QF should charge for pics of QF tails on news sites, every journo must be just sitting there with one in front of 'em, waiting to load a story. Newsworthy or not.

Love the story (not) at the tail of my last post. Seriously who cares about a missing screw? I get the impression it was fixed. End of story. No drama.

Kind regards,

Geoff
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2025
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement