Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th August 2008, 01:58 PM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Slow news day...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4th August 2008, 02:55 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

This is getting absolutely out of hand now..thats pathetic.

Must be a slow news day Nigel!
People must be ringing up these news agencies and telling them every tidbit that goes wrong in the terminal...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th August 2008, 03:01 PM
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Default

What a JOKE

Where are the reports for all the the delays of UA/NZ/AC/DJ etc etc for exactly the same problems

"Qantas, which has grounded a Tokyo-bound jet at the last minute so it can change a faulty part."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4th August 2008, 03:24 PM
Scott Lindsell Scott Lindsell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 193
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew M View Post
What a JOKE
"Qantas, which has grounded a Tokyo-bound jet at the last minute so it can change a faulty part."
What do these idiots who write these articles want. Would they prefer these extremely high tech, million part machines fly without being 100%. It's not your company car you know, slightly more complicated than that.
Morons.


For what it's worth, if I was on a plane that was in a real emergency where survival looked slim there is no other airline in the world I would want to be on than QF.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 4th August 2008, 06:01 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Lindsell View Post
For what it's worth, if I was on a plane that was in a real emergency where survival looked slim there is no other airline in the world I would want to be on than QF.
This man speaketh the truth!

Comments are a bit of an interesting read, some are actually believing this tripe http://www.news.com.au/comments/0,23...014090,00.html , but their are quite a few who realise it for what it is
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 4th August 2008, 06:35 PM
Raymond Rowe's Avatar
Raymond Rowe Raymond Rowe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 550
Default

What would everyone here say if there was a reporter who actually had an aviation background would you jump on them so quickly.They are doing a job and yes people should be made aware of what is going on around the airlines.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 4th August 2008, 07:38 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond Rowe View Post
What would everyone here say if there was a reporter who actually had an aviation background would you jump on them so quickly.They are doing a job and yes people should be made aware of what is going on around the airlines.
Very true, but i dont think comparing this to the incident on QF19 and even the hydraulics problem on the Sydney to Manila flight...this is just a delay on a faulty part that has been repaired...i dont see why it should be front page news!

And, well, i think a reporter who had an aviation background would not be so quick to jump on something like this and make it front page news - Andrew?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 4th August 2008, 07:46 PM
Adam J Adam J is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 35
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhys Xanthis View Post
This man speaketh the truth!

Comments are a bit of an interesting read, some are actually believing this tripe http://www.news.com.au/comments/0,23...014090,00.html , but their are quite a few who realise it for what it is

Check this comment out. I couldn't resist reprinting it here, I know it is a bit O/T but it gave me a laugh.

Flying in general, and not just Qantas, lost its ambience it once had when they removed first class off domestic sectors, allowed passengers attired in clothing more appropriate for the airport public bar to become lounge members, and airlines refused to put sound proof security barriers between the last row of Business and the first row of Economy class.
Posted by: Kevin of Double Bay 2:06pm today
Comment 25 of 39

Gotta love Kev of Double Bay
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 4th August 2008, 11:39 PM
Jason Carruthers's Avatar
Jason Carruthers Jason Carruthers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YBTL
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam J View Post
Check this comment out. I couldn't resist reprinting it here, I know it is a bit O/T but it gave me a laugh.

Flying in general, and not just Qantas, lost its ambience it once had when they removed first class off domestic sectors, allowed passengers attired in clothing more appropriate for the airport public bar to become lounge members, and airlines refused to put sound proof security barriers between the last row of Business and the first row of Economy class.
Posted by: Kevin of Double Bay 2:06pm today
Comment 25 of 39

Gotta love Kev of Double Bay
I read that earlier I can recall the same person's rant when they reported JQ's 1 cent sales earlier which went along the lines of "I'm concerned about the type of passengers these sales attract to air travel. The other day I was appalled that the man sitting next to me in Business class was not wearing a suit and had jeans. etc. etc." Haha It just has to be someone with a good humour stirring the pot.
__________________
2012 FLIGHTS
26JAN QF501 BNE-SYD 73H VH-VXK // 26JAN QF2010 SYD-TMW DH3 VH-TQE // 30JAN FQ606 TMW-BNE J41 VH-TAH // 01AUG DJ1384 BNE-ADL 73H // 11AUG DJ1407 ADL-BNE E90]/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 5th August 2008, 02:40 AM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

Nightline on Ch 9 tonight claimed that 3 planes were delayed for technical reasons blah blah blah, luckily David Cox came on and told them that they would keep planes back as long as nessecary and needed to make the planes 100% serviceable, good on QF for coming out with that, although i think they could go as far as saying media beat up!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2025
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement