Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Technical > Flying and Technical Discussion
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 5th July 2008, 04:08 PM
Craig Lindsay's Avatar
Craig Lindsay Craig Lindsay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kogarah beside flight path
Posts: 141
Default Jet Engines

I was watching an episode of ACI and it was about and air china flight.No.4 engine flamed out,they tried to start it but they were flying too high.Question.how do the engines operate with so little oxygen,and why cant they start any engine that flames out at cruising altitude
__________________
kogarah Gods country
And within walking distance to 8 drinking establishments
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 5th July 2008, 05:23 PM
Andrew McLaughlin's Avatar
Andrew McLaughlin Andrew McLaughlin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig Lindsay View Post
I was watching an episode of ACI and it was about and air china flight.No.4 engine flamed out,they tried to start it but they were flying too high.Question.how do the engines operate with so little oxygen,and why cant they start any engine that flames out at cruising altitude
In short, there's enough oxygen at altitude to keep the fire burning, but not enough to start it!

I'm sure there's a more scientific way of explaining it, but I'll be buggered if I know it!

Will? AJ? Bueller? Anyone?
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6th July 2008, 12:48 AM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

I really have no idea, but heres to guessing.

What Andrew said sounds correct.

And im going to go on and take a random stab...

Burning hydrocarbons needs the hydrocarbon itself and O2, oxygen. When the supply of oxygen is limited, such as at high altitudes, the extent of the reaction would be limited too.

So a lack of oxygen would lead to a lack of the overall reaction which would lead to a flameout. I will take another step further and say temperature and pressure also have a pretty important role as well. Temperature and Pressure are proportional to kinetic energy. A specific amount of energy for a reaction to start is needed (activation energy), so a certain amount of molecules must have equal to or greater than the Activation Energy for the reaction to proceed. So if Temp and Pressure are decreased, so will the amount of energy.

So lower temperature and pressure at the increased altitude, as well as decreased oxygen could all play a part.

This is all guessing by the way, so im probably wrong
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th July 2008, 07:58 AM
Will T Will T is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 175
Default

Hi guys,

The inflight re-start envelope is about ensuring sufficient compressor rotation speed ('windmilling'), and therefore stabilised, steady and smooth airflow through the combustion chamber.

On the 744 Rolls-Royce fleet, our re-start envelope (with a windmilling engine) is as follows:

GND-FL200 240kt IAS - Vmo
FL200-FL300 280kt IAS - Vmo/Mmo (lower of the two)

Boeing and Rolls-Royce essentially guarantee a light-off within 30 sec if the aeroplane is within this envelope. Starts may be attempted outside the envelope (eg. FL360 at 300kt), but they may or may not be successful, and would likely take quite a long time. The envelope for GE engines is essentially very similar, with only minor airspeed differences. I'd imagine the Pratts would also be similar (Mike?).

We also have the option of using the air Starter Motor to assist inflight starts at lower airspeeds. The envelope for the starter motor-assisted relight (RR aircraft) is:

SFC-FL140 0-240kts IAS
FL140-FL180 160kts - 240kts IAS
FL180-FL200 200kts - 240kts IAS
FL200-FL280 200kts - 280kts IAS.

Above these speeds, a purely windmill start should be attempted.

Andrew and Rhys, I thought your comment about oxygen availability was interesting, so I looked up the Rolls-Royce jet engine handbook, and it too says that the envelope is solely predicated on ensuring compressor speed (ie. combustor airflow) for start.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13th July 2008, 06:19 AM
Mike Scott Mike Scott is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: HNL Hawaii USA
Posts: 230
Default

Sorry about the delayed response (been on the road with no access) yes Will, Pratts are almost identical..our 400's upper limit is FL280 with similar speed numbers to what you have posted. Dont have the AC manual anywhere within range otherwise I would list them off.

Regards

MS
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2025
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement