![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clearly all possible preparations made, including foam covered runway, but still a combination of good pilot skills and luck. Fantastic result with no reported injuires!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great landing, just a tad expensive !
__________________
Joined 1999 @www16Right FlightDiary Airliners Web QR Retired PPL C150/172 PA28-161/181 Pitts S-2B SIM: 12Hr QF B767 B744 CX B742 Nikon D100-D200-D300-D500 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Passengers were saying the landing was so smooth they thought the gear was down, fantastic job by pilots.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Amazing effort from the crew - close to a perfect landing. Great footage by the way, spotters can really assist in these situations just showing how good the landing was
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
per The Aviation Herald "about 30 minutes after departure from Newark the crew reported the failure of the center hydraulic system"
wonder if it had an Australian registered plane, would he have had to return to Newark, or proceeded on his trip across the ocean??
__________________
used to fly globally on business, now retired |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Australian registered plane? Or do you mean American registered plane?
__________________
. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Trying to say Qantas, without using the word Qantas?
Too much Qantas lately, like turkey after Christmas
__________________
used to fly globally on business, now retired |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh come on, a QF crew would have done the same as the LO crew and, for that matter, any crew from any other airline... ensure the safest and most efficient 'completion' of the flight. Safest and most efficient in that order, too.
|
![]() |
|
|